Project Optimizer

Updated July 31, 2026

The project optimizer scans your project and scores how well it’s set up for AI coding agents. It checks for missing files, content gaps, code quality issues, setup problems, and cross-file inconsistencies, then gives you prioritized recommendations with one-click fixes.

Opening the optimizer

The fastest route is the gem menu’s optimize entry. You can also choose settings, open the agents tab, and use Agent Files → optimize, or open it from the main menu under Tools > Project Optimizer.

The optimizer runs fresh every time you open it. Click re-analyze to rescan after making changes while the window is still open.

Layout

The optimizer has two tabs:

  • Analyze: health score, category breakdown, and prioritized gap list (left pane) alongside your project’s agent files with edit/create buttons (right pane)
  • Explore: directory browser for navigating your project’s file tree, viewing agent files, and adding saved files from your library to any directory

Health score

The overall health score is a weighted average across four categories:

Category Weight What it measures
Content 3x Quality and completeness of CLAUDE.md instructions
Files 2x Presence of required agent files and cross-file consistency
Code 2x Source code size and organization
Setup 1x Skills, rules, MCP servers, settings, hooks

Scores map to three levels: high (75+), medium (40-74), and low (below 40).

What it checks

File checks

Check Severity What it detects
No CLAUDE.md High Project has no Claude Code instructions
No codex.md High Codex is active but has no instructions
No AGENTS.md Medium Multi-agent project lacks shared instructions
No .claudeignore Medium Large generated directories (node_modules, .build, dist) visible to agents
Subpackage missing CLAUDE.md Low Monorepo subpackage has its own build but no agent instructions

Content checks

Check Severity What it detects
No Build & Run section High Agents can’t build or test without knowing the commands
Build & Run is a placeholder High Section exists but has no real commands
No Architecture section Medium No project map for agents to navigate by
No file size limit stated Medium Without a limit, agents create unbounded files
CLAUDE.md is very short Low Likely a stub; more context improves accuracy
CLAUDE.md over 200 lines Medium Consider splitting into .claude/rules/ for modularity
CLAUDE.md over 400 lines High Well past the recommended limit; split into rules

Content quality checks

Check Severity What it detects
No testing commands section High Agents need to verify their own work
No code conventions or style guide Medium Agents guess at naming, formatting, and patterns
Stack not mentioned Low Manifest file detected but CLAUDE.md doesn’t mention the language/framework
Build section has no copy-pasteable commands Medium Prose-only build instructions; fenced code blocks are more useful
Instructions are too vague Low Multiple vague phrases like “write clean code” with little actual content
No known issues or gotchas section Low Without documented pitfalls, agents hit problems by trial and error
No verification command Medium No verify gate; agents can report success without checking
No commit guidelines Low Without commit discipline, agents bundle unrelated changes

Code checks

Check Severity What it detects
Files over 1000 lines High Source files that are far too large for agents to work with effectively
Files over 500 lines Medium Source files approaching the recommended limit

Setup checks

Check Severity What it detects
No Claude skills configured Low No .claude/commands/ directory with reusable skills
No MCP servers configured Low No .mcp.json for extending agent capabilities
No .claude/rules/ configured Low No modular rule files
Few rules in .claude/rules/ Low Only 1-3 rules; consider adding more
No path-scoped rules Low Monorepo detected but rules don’t use glob scoping
No .claude/settings.json Low No project-level permission rules
No hooks configured Low No hooks to automate lint, type-check, or memory sync
No permission rules in settings Low No allow/deny rules for tool access

Cross-file checks

Check Severity What it detects
Stale paths in CLAUDE.md Medium File paths referenced in CLAUDE.md that no longer exist
CLAUDE.md and codex.md conflict Medium Contradictory naming conventions or file size limits between agent files
CLAUDE.md is gitignored Medium Team members won’t receive project instructions
CLAUDE.local.md not gitignored Medium Local overrides are being shared via git
.claude/settings.local.json not gitignored Medium User-specific permissions are being shared

Project type checks

The optimizer detects your tech stack from manifest files and suggests relevant facets when no project-specific guidance exists:

Stack Detected by Suggestions
Next.js next.config.js/ts/mjs TypeScript setup, accessibility
Node.js package.json Linting configuration, logging
Swift Package.swift Swift tests, concurrency guidance
Python pyproject.toml, requirements.txt Pytest patterns, linting/formatting
Django manage.py Model design, views and serializers
Go go.mod Project structure, error handling patterns
Rust Cargo.toml Clippy lints

Export for agent

Click copy for agent to export the current analysis as optimization-report.md in your project directory. A prompt is copied to your clipboard that you can paste directly into Claude Code or Codex. The agent reads the report and fixes the gaps using real content from your codebase.

Explore tab

The explore tab lets you browse your project’s directory tree. Each directory shows:

  • Agent instruction files with colored badges (claude.md, agents.md, codex.md) and edit buttons
  • Subdirectories with click-to-navigate breadcrumbs
  • “+” buttons on every directory to add files from your saved library